Offering participants a substantial monetary reward did not improve their ability to track two invisible balls in the study.
Sources
- Researchers uncover surprising limit on human imagination (news.harvard.edu)
- https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61021-8.html (ideas.repec.org)
- https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/work/the-capacity-limits-of-moving-objects-in-the-imagination/wrk_300ed260763e87e7c982ec6daa7a99e7 (lacuna.tiptreesystems.com)
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40595700/ (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
More in Psychology
- The study found that for disappeared objects, human imagination primarily uses a serial process, tracking each object one after another rather than simulating multiple objects in parallel.
- Participants who experienced cross-race rejection showed greater attentional bias toward emotionally negative words on an emotional-Stroop task (M=2.54) than those who experienced same-race rejection (M=-0.52), F(1,84)=4.05, p=.047, d=0.44.
- The HBSC 2022 survey found that only one in four adolescents eats vegetables at least once a day.
- A study found that when people from low- and high-income backgrounds live in the same neighborhood, more cross-class marriages form, but this pattern does not occur for interracial marriages.
- DebunkBot's debunking effect was equally effective when participants were told they were speaking with a human expert rather than an AI.
- A 2015 American Psychologist article by Scott E. Maxwell, Michael Y. Lau, and George S. Howard argues that a significant original psychology study result followed by a nonsignificant single replication does not necessarily constitute a genuine failure to replicate, because the replication may have had low statistical power.