The Open Science Collaboration, a consortium of 270 scientists, attempted to replicate 100 published psychology studies and found that more than half of the replications failed.
Sources
- Study that undercut psych research got it wrong (news.harvard.edu)
- A reproducibility crisis? - American Psychological Association (apa.org)
- https://www.cos.io/about/news/massive-collaboration-testing-reproducibility-psychology-studies-publishes-findings (cos.io)
- https://www.arl.org/news/center-for-open-sciences-reproducibility-project-finds-many-studies-not-replicable/ (arl.org)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.349.6251.910 (science.org)
More in Science
- Cenograms were introduced in the publication Terre et Vie.
- The 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans define moderate alcohol consumption as up to one drink per day for women and up to two drinks per day for men.
- The study found that research combining AI and HPC is more likely to introduce novel ideas and achieve top-cited status than research using AI or HPC in isolation, or conventional research using neither.
- Dental microwear analysis compares patterns of pits and scratches on the occlusal or buccal surface of tooth enamel with patterns observed in extant species to infer ecological information.
- A study of spitting cobra venom was published in the journal Science in January 2021.
- A research seminar at Central Oregon Community College requires student teams to complete replication studies supplied by the Collaborative Replication and Education Project, which is associated with OSF.