The corrected evidence in Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson's comment is described as consistent with psychological science reproducibility being statistically indistinguishable from 100%, while being insufficient to reliably estimate whether replicability actually is 100%.
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (gking.harvard.edu)
- http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2018/05/sowing-seeds-of-doubt-how-gilbert-et.html (deevybee.blogspot.com)
- https://retractionwatch.com/2016/03/07/lets-not-mischaracterize-replication-studies-authors/ (retractionwatch.com)
More in Science
- The 2007 PrISMA study surveyed 3,418 children aged 10-14 living in urban areas of Italy.
- According to the ninth AIFA report, the Comirnaty vaccine accounted for 68% of adverse event reports and 71.2% of doses administered in the campaign so far.
- Research indicates that inadequate sleep impairs the consolidation of procedural memories.
- The 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend limiting daily sodium intake to less than 2,300 milligrams.
- For an adiabatic invariant, as the time taken to vary a system between two end points increases toward infinity, the variation of that invariant between the two end points approaches zero.
- In biostratigraphy, biozones are intervals of geological strata defined based on their characteristic fossil taxa.